From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: either I'm stupid or GCC once again has random behaviour Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: <5umb5t0k402vhqgr0h4uk5a0l58si1i4c1@4ax.com> References: <932ou0$8t8ce$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <2561-Thu04Jan2001235404+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <932u4l$908tn$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <9344qr$vb9$1 AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 11 X-Trace: /wsFG36u+IsslHmW+5QGEmx6BeNgVU+NKPvlHqw1CQoVY60LU6pTCKIR/J7bHCkFUflPFME/nGKn!71ajjylGoWeCO4No+Ysem6FZwqtoLdAb9eoNFk6QOqDSFJ87cFq65F7CmcUB9aMkDdja9tNJEw5X!JXo= X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 14:33:50 GMT Distribution: world Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 14:33:50 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In 5 Jan 2001 09:40:43 -0000, jstacey AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (J-P) wrote: >I think "we've had this argument before." I'm still amazed someone hasn't >complained about "g0t0" or "F0rtr AT n." P AT sc@l is on the watch list, I hear. goto: Duff's device; init code in C Fortran: g77 Pascal: gpc Any questions?