From: jstacey AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (J-P) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: either I'm stupid or GCC once again has random behaviour Date: 5 Jan 2001 09:40:43 -0000 Organization: Wadham College, Oxford Lines: 18 Message-ID: <9344qr$vb9$1@plato.wadham.ox.ac.uk> References: <932ou0$8t8ce$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <2561-Thu04Jan2001235404+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <932u4l$908tn$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plato.wadham.ox.ac.uk X-Trace: news.ox.ac.uk 978688183 23447 163.1.164.74 (5 Jan 2001 09:49:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster AT ox DOT ac DOT uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jan 2001 09:49:43 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article <932u4l$908tn$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de>, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: >okay, here we go: > >si - no >b1anc0 - negr0 >g0d - h*** >... > >Why the h*** "h***" is filtered out but g0d is n0t? I think "we've had this argument before." I'm still amazed someone hasn't complained about "g0t0" or "F0rtr AT n." P AT sc@l is on the watch list, I hear. J-P -- "My efforts to be reasonable with you are not going as planned." "You should try being mean to people instead. It's a lot more fun!"