From: Tom St Denis <stdenis AT compmore DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: FreeBE compilation woes
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 23:22:37 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <92tnrk$pm1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <92t02s$3o7$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <6480-Tue02Jan2001204654+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <92tcjg$fdf$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <3A524ECF DOT 7AA5420 AT softhome DOT net> <92tjgv$lr9$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <3A5267B6 DOT 3AD2DCBC AT softhome DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.156.37.224
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jan 02 23:22:37 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x62.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 24.156.37.224
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtomstdenis
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <3A5267B6 DOT 3AD2DCBC AT softhome DOT net>,
  djgpp AT delorie DOT com wrote:
> Tom St Denis wrote:
> > > > Should I revert to
> > > > V2.8.2  of GCC to fix the problem? Or re-write FreeBE?
> > >
> > > Changing ~10 lines in its sources should be enough.
> >
> > Are you sure?  It's every single function that complains about the
code.
>
> ~10 lines in the one source file mentioned in output. But these
changes
> are pretty straightforward anyway. Or find somebody else who has
compiled
> FreeBE with GCC 2.95 and already has a patch.

But FreeBE is more then one file, and I am readily lazy.  All I want
todo is write one driver and I am in a fight with ATI at the same
time.  They don't want to reveal the tech specs on their chipset
(despite it only being usefull to say I dunno ATI card owners!) so it
may not matter anyways.

BOOOOO for Ati, you guys blow!

Tom


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/