Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:07:57 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Kai Dietrich <toepferei DOT dietrich AT t-online DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: replace uclock
In-Reply-To: <3A3C6CC4.FB66D72C@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001217130557.5306C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Kai Dietrich wrote:

> question: Is there any replacment for uclock which
> works also with MIDAS?

Can you tell what causes uclock to stop working with MIDAS?  Perhaps some 
workarounds could be suggested.

As for replacements, please tell what accuracy do you need for time 
measurements, and approximately how do you mean to call such a function.  
It is next to impossible to give a good advice without knowing these 
details.