Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 00:12:38 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Rhide under win 2000
In-Reply-To: <91e3v7$bbg$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10012160009310.133184-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Quasi wrote:

> "Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> wrote in message
> > I haven't tested this myself, but maybe we should tell that RHIDE is
> > practically unusable under Win2000 (I think that ability to compile
> > sources is critical, otherwise why to use RHIDE at all). Maybe one could
> > use Win9X or DOS as guest operating system in WMWare running under
> > Win2000. I don't have WMWare and I'm not using Win2000, so I cannot test
> > it.
> 
> You mentioned WMWare in another thread... do you mean VMWare, or is there
> another such product?

VMWARE

> 
> www.wmware.com takes you to www.vmware.com.
> 
> VMware is of course a commercial product, and has proven less than reliable
> the three times I have tried it.
 
Yes. But if RHIDE cannot compile anything under Win 20000, then trying
to run it under Win9X running under VMWARE could (maybe, but maybe not, I 
don't know) increase reliability

> There is also the freeware FreeMWare (now Plex86) at www.freemware.org which
> does not run under Windows yet.

Andris