Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:43:58 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Daniel Barker <sokal AT holyrood DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Partial upgrade from 2.02 to 2.03?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10010221212000.11888-100000@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001022144058.4367A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Daniel Barker wrote:

> Of the other DJGPP packages I currently have installed, the following
> are less recent than the latest "*b.zip" versions on the nearest DJGPP
> FTP mirror site. Might the above upgrades cause trouble for them?

I don't see in this list any package that would have trouble if you
upgrade djdev and gcc.  However, I would recommend to upgrade at least
Make and Bash, since the versions you have are too old (and, at least for
Bash, there are known nasty bugs in those versions).