Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 21:12:11 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <6480-Fri20Oct2000211208+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h In-reply-to: (message from Damian Yerrick on Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:35:53 GMT) Subject: Re: Support for files > 2 GB References: <8skh36$7oi$1 AT pippin DOT nask DOT waw DOT pl> <2593-Wed18Oct2000192447+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <8smnrk$foh$1 AT pippin DOT nask DOT waw DOT pl> <8011-Thu19Oct2000165639+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <8spmh8$qmm$1 AT pippin DOT nask DOT waw DOT pl> <8011-Fri20Oct2000180537+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Damian Yerrick > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:35:53 GMT > > >Perhaps the Win32 API is behind DJGPP, then ;-). > > Don't DOS filesystem calls go through Win32 somehow? No. Actually, both DOS and Win32 file-related calls go through the same protected-mode Int 21h dispatch code. However, it could be that the Win32 API calls do not use the special bits required for large file support. If they don't use those bits, they won't get large files. Or, it could be a Microsoft docs inaccuracy (so what else is new?).