From: "Edmund Horner" <ejrh AT paradise DOT net DOT nz>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <971736308 DOT 16558 DOT 0 DOT pluto DOT c3ade8b7 AT news DOT demon DOT nl> <8shsqg$ccq$03$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com>
Subject: Re: C source compiling
Lines: 30
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Organization: Paradise Net
Message-ID: <971838376.925094@shelley.paradise.net.nz>
Cache-Post-Path: shelley.paradise.net.nz!unknown AT 203-96-148-136 DOT tnt0 DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:07:02 +1300
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.96.152.26
X-Complaints-To: newsadmin AT xtra DOT co DOT nz
X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 971838378 203.96.152.26 (Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:06:18 NZDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:06:18 NZDT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Perhaps if you ran it through some kind of "code compressor", it would
become a lot smaller.  I believe that most source code is many times larger
than it technically needs to be in ordre to behave.

* Get rid of comments and excess whitespace.
* Use the shortest conceivable identifiers.
* Possibly even use #define's to collapse commonly occurying sequences of
code...

"Peter Remmers" <Peter DOT Remmers AT t-online DOT de> wrote in message
news:8shsqg$ccq$03$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com...
>
> r i v a <webnews AT MAPSONrivari DOT MAPSONdemon DOT nl> schrieb...
>
> > Is there somebody wellwilling to compile a 2420 bytes big
> > c source file, for using under dos.
>
> Hmm, if your source weren't that big, you could have tries
> the public access compiler service on DJ Delorie's pages:
>
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/compile/
>
> It compiles sources up to 1000 bytes.
>
> Peter
>
>
>