From: "23yrold3yrold" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <39e9f547_4 AT spamkiller DOT newsfeeds DOT com> <971687834 DOT 987432 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz> Subject: Re: destroy_bitmap in destructor Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:27:36 -0500 Lines: 38 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 NNTP-Posting-Host: spamkiller Message-ID: <39eb8e82_2@spamkiller.newsfeeds.com> X-Comments: This message was posted through Newsfeeds.com X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeeds.com does not condone, nor support, spam or any illegal or copyrighted postings. X-Comments3: IMPORTANT: Under NO circumstances will postings containing illegal or copyrighted material through this service be tolerated!! X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to You may also use our online abuse reporting from: http://www.newsfeeds.com/abuseform.htm X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, INCLUDING the body (DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS) Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 73,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups. To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Edmund Horner" wrote in message news:971687834 DOT 987432 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz... > > Since this is quite a complicated struct (constructors, functions, et. al.), > would it not be better calling it a class? Since it's all public, I might as well make it a struct; there's really no difference. > What this tells me is that your struct is descended from classes x, y, and > life, and you are calling those constructors! > > Instead, I think you should have (as the first lines of your constructor): > > x = a; > y = b; > life = 0; Same thing. > I am not sure why you're trying to delete what appears to be an integer > result here... I'm still learning iterators; I discovered that was where my error was. > You don't have the compiler and library sources installed, I expect. > new2.cc is probably the part of the compiler (or library, I can't remember > which) that tells how the new and delete operators work. Code works now, but I STILL don't know what new2.cc is, or how the compiler can tell me there's a problem in a file I don't have. Chris