Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 07:56:03 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <9003-Mon16Oct2000075603+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
In-reply-to: <ushjusscrvhtitkgaodl5s8s3kgnu2eq15@4ax.com> (message from Damian
	Yerrick on Sun, 15 Oct 2000 15:05:35 GMT)
Subject: Re: rhide and NT
References: <8sc4es$h4o$1 AT inf6serv DOT rug DOT ac DOT be> <ushjusscrvhtitkgaodl5s8s3kgnu2eq15 AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 15:05:35 GMT
> 
> Yes, DOS.  NT's virtual DOS machine has bugs and missing features that
> get in the way of debugging a DOS program.

Really?  What problems with debugging did you see on NT?  I don't
think I ever heard about them.

The only problems I'd understand are with debugging programs which use
signals, and then only when the signal is actually generated under the
debugger.