Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 08:25:56 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Building gdb 5.0
In-Reply-To: <39DA32AC.26661.C0492@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001004082416.21716A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> > > Unpacking and configuring was Ok (except not significant 
> > > filename conflicts).
> > 
> > Hmm?  The special batch file which you should use to unpack is
> > supposed to rename files on the fly to prevent these conflicts.  How
> > come it didn't work for you?
> > 
> 
> This was mentioned in initial announcement about GDB-5.0 in DJGPP mailing list:
> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2000/05/23/07:00:55	

Ah, those.  Sorry, I forgot about this glitch.  (The GDB maintainer 
promised in the future to wait a bit more than a few hours between the 
last pretest and the release, to avoid last-minute problems such as this 
one.)