Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20000930015456.0341beb0@mail.subdimension.com> X-Sender: matt DOT l AT mail DOT subdimension DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:58:34 -0700 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, lancep AT bcm DOT tmc DOT edu From: Matt Lewandowsky Subject: Re: EMM386 and DPMI Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: <4331-Mon25Sep2000221615+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <39CB7D13 DOT 606B286E AT bcm DOT tmc DOT edu> <8qfdfv$hq0$1 AT otis DOT netspace DOT net DOT au> <39CB7D13 DOT 606B286E AT bcm DOT tmc DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hmm.... So, why this line? "If your memory manager is EMM386, I recommend to put the NOEMS NOVCPI parameters on its command line." It seems as if you'd advise people to only do that if they note that "mem" only reports 32MB of EMS... Oh, yeah... Since Win98 doesn't come with the MS-DOS help.com anymore, I can't look up the answer to this question: "Does NOEMS imply NOVCPI? Or is it really possible to have VCPI with no EMS?" - --Matt At 13.16 09/25/2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: "Lance W. Patterson" > > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:38:59 -0500 > > > > Microsoft's "EMM386.EXE" is used primarily for two things. > > > > 1. Freeing up "real mode" memory. > > 2. Providing EMS memory(a joke), if needed. > >Before you dismiss EMS as ``a joke'', let me remind you that EMS is >required to have VCPI, which is not a joke at all in the context of >DJGPP. See section 3.9 of the DJGPP FAQ list for more details about >this. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOdWrOuoMko8dOmunEQI1KACg1JAR+TuhiRlRorYeDatlvSRV1jcAnjYZ X6yaUDbwdANKI8W9Ur0JSzIt =kFd7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----