From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: The Future of DJGPP Date: 12 Sep 2000 11:10:09 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 24 Distribution: world Message-ID: <8pl2uh$2in$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <967904615 DOT 832712 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz> <39B16ACD DOT F45CD739 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <39B3E6A2 DOT 19C880E9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <39B5676C DOT 5C9B914 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <39b6bafd DOT 13383847 AT news DOT wins DOT uva DOT nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 968757009 2647 137.226.32.75 (12 Sep 2000 11:10:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Sep 2000 11:10:09 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Evert Glebbeek wrote: > From: Damian Yerrick > On Wed, 06 Sep 2000 02:22:13 GMT [...] >>If nobody builds a Cygwin hosted DJGPP (like the Linux hosted DJGPP), >>we'll have to figure out how to use Cygwin make to call gcc using, >>say, a response file to pass >126 character command lines. > How about using the version of make distributed with MinGW? Or are > there problems I'm not aware of? MinGW make has the exact same problem as Cygwin make: it's a Win32 application, and it does not know how to call DJGPP executables and pass them overly long command lines. The trick suggested by Damian would be to make a compiler targetting DJGPP, where the compiler itself is *not* built with DJGPP, but with Cygwin (or MinGW32, whichever you prefer). This would then allow Cygwin or MinGW32 'make' to pass it long command lines, and it would also remove the long filename invisibility bugging NT users of DJGPP. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.