From: pjfarley AT banet DOT net (Peter J. Farley III) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Perl Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 03:43:53 GMT Message-ID: <398f7de4.6454262@news3.banet.net> References: X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.100.84.201 X-Trace: 8 Aug 2000 03:40:08 GMT, 32.100.84.201 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services Lines: 43 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT prserv DOT net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: >On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, taupin wrote: > >> Using the perl552 of the distrib, I still have problems with @INC >> (files not fond although existing). This happens when trying tu use >> latex2html (the configure under bash fails, while it works under linux). > >Does @INC, when printed, include backslashes? If so, try to tinker with >your Perl configuration to convert them to forward slashes. (Don't ask >me how, I don't use Perl too much.) I believe that the perl5/DJGPP maintainer set up the *build* for perl 5.52 with backslashes for a PATH separator, but I *think* that only affects the build operation, not the value of @INC. You might also try asking a question on changing default path separators on the perl forum, comp.lang.perl.misc. I'm not an expert myself, or I would try to give you more help. >> -> is there a more recent PERL package for djgpp? > >I understand that you can compile the official distribution, if you want. Yes, the current "stable.zip" distribution (perl 5.6.0) does compile "right out of the box" under DJGPP (v2.03, bash v2.03, gcc 2.95.2, make 3.78.1). I have DL'd and compiled 5.6.0 within the last week. There is a problem with the "make test" scripts, though. They do not seem to run very well at all, even using the earlier bash 1.14.7(2) that the maintainer recommends. The DJGPP perl maintainer is aware of this problem, and I am trying to help him figure out why the problem occurs. One of us will certainly report back here when the problem is resolved. And yes, Eli, I know I should upgrade my make version to 3.79... It's on my list of "round to-its" for Real Soon Now... :) I may, in fact, force myself to do it sooner rather than later to help eliminate the make version as a component of the perl "make test" problem. HTH. ---------------------------------------------------- Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT nospam DOT dorsai DOT org OR pjfarley AT nospam DOT banet DOT net)