From: AndrewJ <luminous-is AT REMOVE DOT home DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Vs: WATCOM vs. DJGPP
Message-ID: <2qcgoso5cv0i6qllki9pqih2jc05ptl9n6@4ax.com>
References: <39874ce2 DOT 50081575 AT news DOT wins DOT uva DOT nl> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0008020650100 DOT 4277-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 14:44:33 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.42.120.18
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace: news2.rdc1.on.home.com 965227473 24.42.120.18 (Wed, 02 Aug 2000 07:44:33 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 07:44:33 PDT
Organization: Excite AT Home - The Leader in Broadband
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>> >Like somebody buys Watcom...
>> >I have it and i didn't buy it.
>> which is illegal. No matter if you don't have personal problems with
>> that. You shouldn't be advocating criminal activity in a newsgroup.
>
>Unfortunately the outlandish pricing of some companies leaves us poor
>users no other choice than to download the limited time version and crack
>it.

That's still no excuse for it.  And AFAIK, there are no time-limited versions
of compilers.  Some companies make their living on this.  It takes a lot of
time and effort to write and maintain a compiler, you know.  I could have had a
burned copy of WC11, but chose instead to purchase it.  It made me feel good
knowing that I hard worked hard to afford it, instead of stealing it.

--------
Andrew J

"This is a wonderful answer.  It's off-topic, it's incorrect, and it doesn't
answer the question." - Richard Heathfield.