From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: [zippo-workers] Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU Make 3.79.1 uploaded Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 17:50:38 +0100 Organization: Customer of Energis Squared Lines: 29 Message-ID: <39845CDE.37539023@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> References: <3983E03E DOT 15435933 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200007301003 DOT PAA00864 AT midpec DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-42.amandil.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk 964981015 30455 62.136.103.170 (30 Jul 2000 18:16:55 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jul 2000 18:16:55 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Damian Yerrick wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2000 15:33:10 +0530, Prashant TR wrote: > > >I may have missed a few messages but I have some comments. Now, how > >would the order of installation matter? AFAIK, there isn't a package > >which requires to be installed in some *order*. Can you quote an > >example? > > allegro requires gcc and binutils. > make requires gcc and binutils. > gpp requires gcc and binutils. > gcc and binutils require djdev. > bash pretty much requires fileutils and textutils. Sure, these packages have requirements, but for the last example you can quite happily install fileutils, textutils, bash in order you like, as long as they are all installed. Prashant's question is about packages where the order of installation does matter. There are some - see my other response. Bye, -- Richard Dawe [ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]