Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:00:34 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: GAMMELJL AT SLU DOT EDU
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: genprec and gmp
In-Reply-To: <01JQTYWSFSX49JQ1FC@SLU.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000621100017.11317B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 GAMMELJL AT SLU DOT EDU wrote:

>      A factor 2 is quite valuable.  I would like to see gmp
> rewritten in C++, complex numbers introduced, and the elementary
> transcendental functions included in the package.

Just a random thought: it is not unheard of to have a program
rewritten in C++ suffer a twofold slow-down.  Perhaps this is the main
reason your implementation is so much slower.