Sender: tr AT bgl2 DOT vsnl DOT net DOT in
Message-ID: <3933E76B.D40B23B6@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 21:38:11 +0530
From: Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Linux
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0005301941250 DOT 1881-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

> You may also be getting a lot more corrupted FAT systems than *real DOS*
> produces...

I've been using this for quite sometime. DOSEmu 1.0 is quite stable, IMHO and
I've so far, never run into *any* problems with FS corruption. So, IMHO this
is more comfortable.