From: buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: windows version of Crafty
Date: 22 May 2000 11:08:10 GMT
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <8gbbce.3vs4i2t.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <003101bfc355$56967280$fa13ddcc AT lhaglund> <8g9ndb DOT 3vs4i2t DOT 0 AT buerssner-17104 DOT user DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de> <72ahis47e2qahll2k6n2cufc5dd4g6df3f AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pec-45-56.tnt3.s2.uunet.de (149.225.45.56)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 958993690 998416 149.225.45.56 (16 [17104])
X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/1.3.13.0
User-Agent: Xnews/03.02.04
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Damian Yerrick wrote:

>On 21 May 2000 20:13:28 GMT, buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner) wrote:
>>Sorry, you can't with plain DJGPP. You may be able to create an
>>executable, that works with winboard, after installing RSXNT.
>>
>>The easiest option you have, is to download wcrafty.x.y.exe or compile
>>it with MSVC (which also will give a faster executable).
>
>What about mingw32?

I don't know, what you are refering this to. It should be possible
to compile crafty with mingw32. It would need some Makefile hacking.
I said easiest, because the OP seems to have problems with Makefiles.
(There is a working makefile for nmake and MSVC in the crafty 
distribution. The DJGPP port doesn't seem to be maintained anymore,
I have sent Makefile patches long ago ...)

When you are refering to the speed. Due to the author of crafty,
MSVC will compile the fastest crafty executable, almost 30% faster
than gcc compiled. I can confirm this (and I tried many Compiler
switches). One can also see it at the assembler level.

-- 
Dieter Buerssner