Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 16:37:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200005202037.QAA25375@indy.delorie.com> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Thomas J. Hruska" CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20000519211524.007c7290@pop.crosswinds.net> (shinelight AT crosswinds DOT net) Subject: Re: Inline ASM question... References: <8empao$5k6$1 AT nnrp02 DOT primenet DOT com> <390ef9f9$0$72098 AT SSP1NO17 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> <8emvhq$7mn$1 AT nnrp03 DOT primenet DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 20000505015633 DOT 007b2210 AT pop DOT crosswinds DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 20000510204858 DOT 007b6e40 AT pop DOT crosswinds DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 20000511021045 DOT 007af4a0 AT pop DOT crosswinds DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 20000519211524 DOT 007c7290 AT pop DOT crosswinds DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 21:15:24 -0500 > From: "Thomas J. Hruska" > > Hello, I am doing that inline ASM thing...again. The situation is that I > am trying to speed up screen dumps from a buffer to the video buffer using > far pointers. The idea here is to perform the buffer copy using only one > far pointer reference and a rep. Library function `movedata' already does that. I suggest to use it instead of messing with inline assembly.