From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: slow compiler
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 17:28:45 +0400
Organization: MTU-Intel ISP
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <3926930D.5FA33DF3@mtu-net.ru>
References: <CzuV4.14$%u5 DOT 1873 AT nsw DOT nnrp DOT telstra DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp105-143.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 958829281 66276 212.188.105.143 (20 May 2000 13:28:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2000 13:28:01 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

TMPDIR=F: doesn't really help. You need a disk cache because your GCC
(programs, header files, libraries) still lives on HDD not RAM. Btw, CWSDPMI
also takes some time to be found and loaded.
Why don't you refer to the FAQ? It has tons of advice and tips.

-- 
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

mick liber wrote:
> 
> Rhide compiles slow under DOS....
> I have 65meg ram....made ram disk as F: drive
> and made it 10meg.
> Djpp.env...changed to TMPDIR =F:
> Rhide still takes ages to compile..
> What am i doing wrong ?