Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 10:53:33 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: C++, complex, etc
In-Reply-To: <taKT4.110$%a4.10296@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000515105310.9209N-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 15 May 2000, Paul Cechner wrote:

> perhaps you should try
> #include <complex>
> instead of
> #include <complex.h>

These two headers are identical (actually, <complex.h> includes
<complex>).

> > #include <_Complex.h>
> I hear that the reason headers are named using the mentioned convention  is
> because of the non-case sensitivity of ms-dos based OSs...
> 
> perhaps this is just a load of half-remembered half-truths from a half-c++
> programmer with not much experience with djgpp :)

No, this is from the DJGPP FAQ (section 8.3).