Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 06:55:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200005121055.GAA14405@indy.delorie.com>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To: April <awhite AT user DOT rose DOT com>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <391B48B2.EC895C48@user.rose.com> (message from April on Thu, 11
	May 2000 18:56:34 -0500)
Subject: Re: installed djgpp 203 - cxxfilt dup
References:  <391B48B2 DOT EC895C48 AT user DOT rose DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: April <awhite AT user DOT rose DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 18:56:34 -0500
>
> There is a note in gnu\gcc-2.952\problems.txt that states:
> 
>    Q) gpp2952b.zip contains file cxxfilt.exe which has same name as
> similar one
>       from binutils package (bnu281b.zip)
> 
>    A) It's recommended to keep newer file. As gcc-2.95.2 is newer than
>       binutils-2.8.1 than keep one from gcc-2.95.2.
> 
> The file in binutils is newer (28/02/00 13:21) than that in gpp2952
> (14/01/00 06:52)

The above quotation talks about binutils-2.8.1, not about
binutils-2.9.5.1, which is what you are evidently using.

Also, see section 22.2 of the FAQ, which gives a more general advice.

> So, which do I keep?

The newer version, as the common sense would suggest.