From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: gdb problem or just silly me - please help Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:15:17 +0100 Organization: Customer of Planet Online Lines: 20 Message-ID: <3905EEC5.836F724B@bigfoot.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-88.argon.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk 956698205 17366 62.136.17.88 (25 Apr 2000 21:30:05 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2000 21:30:05 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The problem with using -gstabs+ by default is that SYMIFY doesn't > support stabs, so -gstabs+ renders stack tracebacks unusable, unless > you run the program inside GDB or RHIDE. > > If and when someone teaches SYMIFY about stabs, DJGPP will probably > switch to -gstabs+ as the default. Eli, ISTR that you had a BFD version of symify that did work with stabs+ debugging. Maybe I am confused, but is this the case? I remember you sent me bfdsymify when I had some weird debugging problems, which we never got to the bottom of. Bye, -- Richard Dawe richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/