From: eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: WDOSX
Date: 25 Apr 2000 07:51:52 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <8e3iqo$i6j$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References: <38ff20bd$0$58948 AT SSP1NO17 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> <39045ED0 DOT 3F417452 AT dasoft DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lws256.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Tom St Denis (tom AT dasoft DOT org) wrote:
: It's a really stable dos extender two main features over CWSDPMI

: 1)  Compressed executables
: 2)  It binds directly into your program, so no 'two exe' distributions

: The cons:

: 1)  No virtual memory
: 2)  If you actually distribute more then one exe CWSDPMI takes less
: space.

Why is it that if the extender can be bound to the executable, it
doesn't support virtual memory (like PMODE/DJ and WDOSX) while those
which can't be bound does support virtual memory (like CWSDPMI)?


Genesis, Wind and Wuthering,

							MartinS