Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:32:46 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: CWSDPMI r5
In-Reply-To: <38fcedb1.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000419103009.10023Y-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> It doesn't do much for anyone unless
> they have and need to use big chunks of memory (more than 128Mb physical or
> more than 255Mb total virtual).  And it still has some physical memory 
> performance issues around 512Mb physical - so it solves a very narrow range
> of people's problems.

I'd say that machines with more than 128MB of physical memory are 
becoming widespread enough to make this range of problems
not-too-narrow.

So I think it would be great if r5 could be released some time soon ;-).