Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:09:14 +0600 (LKT)
From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender: root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
In-Reply-To: <8dh0tn.3vvqu6v.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004181808310.2713-100000@darkstar.grendel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 18 Apr 2000, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

> Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:
> 
> >It once again proved that a good optimising compiler can do a excellent
> >job...also the wisdom of running a profiler and seing which routines take
> >up most time...
> 
> I can say one thing in the defense of Alexei. I don't know, whether
> he used the profiler, or not. But there is profiling code in his 
> sources. I did a very quick profile of his code. IHMO, he correctly
> identified the bottlenecks.

Yes, but was the hand optimization he did worth it.....

Grendel

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)