From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:44:24 +0400 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 22 Message-ID: <38FC66B8.BDE360B3@mtu-net.ru> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp103-164.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 956069919 18329 212.188.103.164 (18 Apr 2000 14:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Apr 2000 14:58:39 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Cyrix 6x86. Originally it was P266, but something burnt out and now it doesn't work on frequencies higher than 133MHz anymore. IMHO a good CPU, but you may disagree. At least it's enough for me. :) -- Alexei A. Frounze ----------------------------------------- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: > > > It's not wrong, since I don't get your results with (USEC=USEC2=1 and -O > > switch). I get it *slower*. And I have no idea what's up. > > Perhaps the differences in CPUs are the reason. I believe Dieter has a > K6. What's your CPU?