From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:15:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Odp: CWSDPMI r5
Message-ID: <38FC43EC.16496.EB0C2@localhost>
References: <38FB410C DOT 26753 DOT D0CA35 AT localhost>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000418110804.28255B-100000@is>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 18 Apr 2000, at 11:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:
> 
> > In FAQ (14.2):   
> > (For PGCC and GCC version 2.95 and later, use -O6 instead of -O2.)
> > 
> > For all versions of gcc (including gcc-2.95.2) optimization levels higher 
> > than -O3 is taken as -O3, only for PGCC -O4, -O5,... have some 
> > meaning)
> 
> Thanks for the corrections.
> 
> Does GCC 2.96 (the development version) change this in any way?  What
> about the Haifa scheduler--does it change the meaning of -O* switches?

No. As far I grepped sources of gcc-2.96 19990322 (latest sources I 
have unpacked on Windows partition, I have this night CVS version 
on Linux partition, but I don't want to reboot now) the highest used 
optimization level is 3. Also HAIFA scheduler does not change 
anything here.

Andris