Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 12:09:58 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
In-Reply-To: <38FC0F43.87E209B3@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000418120905.28255f-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> It's not wrong, since I don't get your results with (USEC=USEC2=1 and -O
> switch). I get it *slower*. And I have no idea what's up.

Perhaps the differences in CPUs are the reason.  I believe Dieter has a 
K6.  What's your CPU?