From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: djgpp equivalent of borland __emi__ function Date: 17 Apr 2000 11:36:17 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 18 Message-ID: <8desvh$ilo$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <34AK4.1308$Uy5 DOT 1641536 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 955971377 19128 137.226.32.75 (17 Apr 2000 11:36:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Apr 2000 11:36:17 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Alexandre Devaure wrote: > Hi > I need to port Borland c code to djgpp. But in the code sources, the coder > used the __emit__ function. This function puts opcode directly in the text > segment. Does it exist an equivalent function with djgpp ? The closest equivalent would be an inline assembly statement. If my guess that __emit__ outputs not via an assembly mnemonic, but directly by hexcode, you can use '.byte 0xab' syntax. See sys/farptr.h for examples (the segment overrides are code like that, there). OTOH, chances are that recent binutils even support your opcodes as mnemonics, removing the need for machine code. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.