Message-ID: <38FABF19.EA155238@mtu-net.ru>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:36:57 +0400
From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Help with Inline ASM...
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000417102032 DOT 14867G-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Recipient: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > Damian Yerrick wrote:
> > > Wasn't the "flat model" discussed before here?  I think we called
> > > DJGPP's model a "32-bit tiny model."
> >
> > Well, what's the actual difference of these terms in your opinion?
> 
> Damian refers to the same discussion I mentioned earlier in this thread.
> In that discussion, the differences between these terms were beaten to
> death, several times.
> 
> In addition, I explained, again, why DJGPP's memory model is not flat
> in this thread yesterday.

We will never reach the end of this discussion. Let's just give up with it. How
you call DJGPP's memory model doesn't affect my code and how I call it doesn't
affect yours. I'm stopping this thread, since we have not reached common
conclusion and that's not a serious subject to talk about.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru