From: "Al Amzeen (Alexandr Amzin)" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: c|net: Microsoft has officially killed MS-DOS. Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:41:02 +0400 Organization: Fidolook Express page http://fidolook.da.ru Lines: 23 Message-ID: <8debuk$2ulc$1@gavrilo.mtu.ru> References: <0vlffsc21hthnqfaramn08d9gb9jfk5v74 AT 4ax DOT com> <0671ec78 DOT 58ba4650 AT usw-ex0110-075 DOT remarq DOT com> <38FA0BD9 DOT 15FAB05E AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38FA294B DOT C1C60FBB AT mtu-net DOT ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp97-116.dialup.mtu-net.ru X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 955953941 96940 212.188.97.116 (17 Apr 2000 06:45:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Apr 2000 06:45:41 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Fidolook Express V1.51rus for MS OE 5.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Greetings, Alexei A. Frounze ! You wrote: > We don't have _well-known_ alternate software. IMHO there is not enough > advertisments of such products. Most of people have MSWindows on home/office > compiters and use their products as well. Market share is not balanced here. And > if we wanna change situation with Microsoft, we must solve problem with > advertisment, teach people how to work with other similar products instead of > MS' ones and develop lacking/missing products as alternate replacement. This > needs a lot of money. None pay for it. There is no need to teach someone. GNU products are cool enough with their marketing policy. So, I don't think that Microsoft guilty or not until court is thinking of. I know one thing: there is a couple of people that using bare Win and only GNU and other free for distribution tools -- and it's working fine. ps. The best advertisement is the quality of product.