From: "OiSyN" <mailme AT oisyn DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: alternative malloc
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:49:05 +0200
Message-ID: <955914263.15211.0.pluto.d4ee0fa5@news.demon.nl>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000416105208 DOT 2482l-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: x-project.demon.nl
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: x-project.demon.nl:212.238.15.165
X-Trace: news.demon.nl 955914263 pluto:15211 NO-IDENT x-project.demon.nl:212.238.15.165
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT nl DOT demon DOT net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Lines: 14
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> If your program has replacements for malloc, free, and realloc, then
> the linker will use them instead of the versions in the library.
>
> But you *must* implement all the 3 functions, since the library
> version has them all on a single module.

Ah... I only wrote a malloc and a free, but it didn't work... Thanx!

OiSyN
mailme AT oisyn DOT com