From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: THE -O2 PROBLEM - PART II Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:16:41 +0400 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 31 Message-ID: <38F82569.817316A6@mtu-net.ru> References: <38F20E7A DOT 3330E9A4 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F6C64E DOT C7753C6C AT mtu-net DOT ru> <8d7l3g$j3i$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <38F76B94 DOT 5E968BA7 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F7A6FE DOT ED9B3E59 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F82ABA DOT FEBEB2B0 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp97-7.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 955786835 15072 212.188.97.7 (15 Apr 2000 08:20:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Apr 2000 08:20:35 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com it eliminates C code but not inline asembly. For example: if (KeyMap[sTab]) { // key is pressed do_something(); while (KeyMap[sTab]) {}; // this line is replaced with infinite loop } But I need that line AS-IS. thanks. Alexei A. Frounze ----------------------------------------- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > "Alexei A. Frounze" wrote: > > > > But with optimizations enabled, I simply get faulty code, since compiler > > eliminates checking of the array. How to prevent this from optimizations? > > If the compiler eliminates the entire inline asm block, one way to prevent it > is with "__asm__ __volatile__" instead of just "__asm__" or "asm". > > If that's not the problem, I suggest to post the offending code fragment and > its surroundings.