From: Vinzent Hoefler <JeLlyFish DOT software AT gmx DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: MICROSOFT has Bought Over Linus Torvalds!!
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:38:27 +0200
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <8d5b8o$1it$1@news08.btx.dtag.de>
References: <38EF20D0 DOT 5550EADC AT bigfoot DOT com> <00041114440503 DOT 10635 AT sparky DOT lineo DOT com> <38F4F2D4 DOT 87A2AB6 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news08.btx.dtag.de 955658328 1629 777000109768-0002 000413 20:38:48
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT t-online DOT de
X-Sender: 777000109768-0002 AT t-dialin DOT net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/16.534
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com> wrote:

[Windows95C and the AMD K6-II/350 Patch]
>> So if you have an intel or Cyrix processor, it will work?
>
>Truthfully, I do not know.

At the moment it does.
But who knows, we all know that faster processors already caused so
many delay loops to fail over the time... ;-)

>I don't think there is a problem with these
>processors, since I have not seen an equivalent patch for Intel or Cyrix
>processors.

That's correct. Their LOOP instruction simply isn't fast enough to
cause overflow.


Vinzent.

-- 
The best optimizer is between your ears.
                -- Michael Abrash