From: jstacey AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (J-P) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Linking in .a files from within RHIDE Date: 8 Apr 2000 19:39:24 +0100 Organization: Wadham College Oxford Lines: 21 Message-ID: <8cnucs$c6r$1@plato.wadham.ox.ac.uk> References: <8ciba7$ttq$1 AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <38ECD3B0 DOT FE8403F8 AT hotmail DOT com> <8ckdam$343$1 AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <38EE012C DOT 3008E816 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> NNTP-Posting-Host: plato.wadham.ox.ac.uk X-Trace: news.ox.ac.uk 955219165 8755 163.1.164.74 (8 Apr 2000 18:39:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster AT ox DOT ac DOT uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Apr 2000 18:39:25 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article <38EE012C DOT 3008E816 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >However, I'd be surprised if the speed difference could actually matter for >any reasonable-size program. Yes. To be fair, I'm probably getting the "Hello, world" artefact here by having a small program compiled under both compilers. We currently don't /have/ any big programs to compile: historically, we're using Turbo Pascal. My supervisor is used to Turbo C, and likes the djgpp package largely because of RHIDE. At any rate, we will eventually convert all our programs to C, but the compiler to be used is as yet undecided; until that point, I don't have any largeish demo programs to show either him or you the relative compilation time. This may change soon. Watch this space. J-P -- "Step five is to secretly switch the majority leader's coffee with these." "These aren't coffee crystals." "Dry ice is funnier."