From: "Ralf A. Quint" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Is DOS dead? Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:31:07 -0700 Organization: The World Wide Web Lines: 18 Message-ID: <9qoheskkhgth57hcp9d6sivsj11e1fk9l9@4ax.com> References: <38e4f88b$0$80798 AT SSP1NO17 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> <38E61AD6 DOT 120832D6 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> <38e704e3$0$81194 AT SSP1NO17 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> X-Complaints-To: newsabuse AT supernews DOT com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:42:09 GMT, Damian Yerrick wrote: >On 2 Apr 2000 09:51:36 GMT, lintux_doesnt_like AT spam DOT lintux DOT cx (Wilmer >van der Gaast) wrote: > >>Bar qnl, Sybevna K znqr gur sbyybjvat jbeqf nccrne ba bhe fperraf: >>> The bad think is, that Lineo doesn't think so :-((((((. It's DOS is the best >>> (memory manager, DPMS, taskmanager). >>> If it would be released under GPL, many programmers would develope them. >>> >>We already have a GPL'ed DOS. FreeDOS. > >With a data-destroying bug on drives larger than half a gigabyte. Could you stop complaining and give more constructive infos, so we can fix whatever bug there might be......