From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Interrupt wrapper (was Re: keyboard interrupt) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:57:00 +0400 Organization: MTU-Intel ISP Lines: 15 Message-ID: <38E0E45C.DCDF156@mtu-net.ru> References: <8bod7h$rj1$1 AT gxsn DOT com> <38DFBF98 DOT 8BEB44EB AT corel DOT com> <38DFE9E5 DOT 37B0F318 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38E0B41D DOT 4046948D AT corel DOT com> <38E0BD61 DOT CF54CF91 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38E0DC7C DOT CE330DAB AT corel DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp111-55.dialup.mtu-net.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 954262723 24800 212.188.111.55 (28 Mar 2000 16:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Mar 2000 16:58:43 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ru To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Jonathan Meunier wrote: > Oh, sorry, I just thought a wrapper would do more than that.. well, it's > already doing enough (preventing program from potential crash). Sure. It's the main reason. > Thanks for sharing your knowledge ;) Not at all. :) Alexei A. Frounze -- Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru Mirror: http://members.xoom.com/alexfru