Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:03:15 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
cc: Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fastest bitblt?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002290817350.818-100000@midpec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000229110255.22619F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Prashant TR wrote:

> To map these addresses,
> you'll need to use another dangerous call __djgpp_physical_map.

You mean __djgpp_map_physical_memory, I presume.

This call only works with CWSDPMI and 386Max, since it requires a
DPMI 1.0 function 0508h.