From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Fastest bitblt? Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:03:18 +0000 Organization: Customer of Planet Online Lines: 32 Message-ID: <38BAD486.2AC7838F@bigfoot.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-117.medroxyprogest.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk 951768562 21597 62.136.88.245 (28 Feb 2000 20:09:22 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2000 20:09:22 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Damian Yerrick wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 18:20:28 +0600 (LKT), Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel > wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote: > > > And Linux doesn't need virus scanners, as system EXEs cannot > > > be overwritten by a user program. > > > > I havent come across viruses that have been written for linux but I > > suppose there might be a few. > > Any Solaris viruses? HP-UX viruses? > > > BTW Are there any friends on the list who know of any viruses for > > UNIX/LINUX? There are viruses for Linux, but they aren't that numerous. There are also virus scanners for Linux. I can't remember any links offhand, but http://www.securityfocus.com/ must have a link somewhere. You can overwrite system executable on Linux, you just have to know what exploit to use. The idea that there can be no viruses for Linux and Unices is a fallacy. It's just much, much harder. Bye, -- Richard Dawe richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/