From: "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Prevent crash on free() Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:40:36 -0500 Organization: Nortel Networks Lines: 21 Message-ID: <38BACF34.A7DC20B0@americasm01.nt.com> References: <89e5e3$8g1$1 AT cubacola DOT tninet DOT se> <89e72m$hpt$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <89e7oq$cmv$1 AT cubacola DOT tninet DOT se> <89ecto$jum$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <89ee3g$8pf$1 AT zingo DOT tninet DOT se> NNTP-Posting-Host: wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785) X-Accept-Language: en To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Marcus wrote: > Is it impossible to know if the function have been called this way > func ("..."); > or > char* a = malloc(10); > func (a); > ? > Do you understand what I mean? And what is YAMD? In general, I believe a good policy is: A library (or class, etc) shouldn't free memory it didn't allocate. I don't think your 'func' function should be free'ing any memory it doesn't allocate itself. -- (\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)