Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:00:01 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Waldemar Schultz <schultz AT mathematik DOT tu-muenchen DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Executable size: limit to acceptability?
In-Reply-To: <38833481.B3893568@ma.tum.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000117185837.25190C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Waldemar Schultz wrote:

> IMHO e.g. allegro and grx23 makefiles use -O6
> shouldn't gcc complain beeing passed a no-op Option switch?

I don't think so.  Otherwise, many Makefile's will have to be changed 
when using a different compiler.  Right now, "make CC=pgcc" is all you 
need to switch from GCC to PGCC, say.

An option that is a no-op cannot hurt.