Message-ID: <387E13CE.2AD423E6@esc11.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:05:02 -0600
From: Stuart Highlander <mathgod AT esc11 DOT net>
Organization: Bridgeport ISD
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: bcc2grx, grx, and bgi
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000113092634 DOT 9693E-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

We do not have a graphics.h anywhere in the bcc2grx folder.  Have we
overlooked something?

Stuart

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Stuart Highlander wrote:
>
> > We have dowqnloaded grx23 and bcc2grx, run make on the
> > test files, and have achieved success on the test programs (we have been
> > able to build the the c test programs from a project in RHIDE).  Our
> > problem is that all of our resources are written in Borland
> > (graphics.h).  Is there an easy crossover, i.e. can we use the source
> > codes from our text,  for these programs so that we can still use what
> > we have on our lab machines?.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand the problem.  BCC2GRX *is* the solution to
> such cases, it comes with graphics.h that emulate Borland's.  So what
> exactly is your problems?