From: "Stephen Howe" <sjhowe AT dial DOT pipex DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Why did ID choose DJGPP for Quake?
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 00:01:44 -0000
Organization: UUNET WorldCom server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNET WorldCom
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <84gsav$bfh$4@lure.pipex.net>
References: <94622644001 AT out DOT newmail DOT net> <BCna4.65265$X47 DOT 355046 AT quark DOT idirect DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: userca06.uk.uudial.com
X-Trace: lure.pipex.net 946599071 11761 62.188.150.74 (31 Dec 1999 00:11:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT uk DOT uu DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Dec 1999 00:11:11 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>>IMNSHO, Watcom (still) produces better code than GCC.

It varies Andrew. It would better to check the types of optimisation each
compiler does.

Stephen Howe