From: Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: is 'ld --wrap' not for C++?
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:04:18 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3856A623 DOT 14E00791 AT yahoo DOT com> <3857355F DOT CA2254D5 AT gs707 DOT com>
X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-ELN-Date: 15 Dec 1999 10:04:40 GMT
X-ELN-Insert-Date: Wed Dec 15 03:25:13 1999
Organization: Nocturnal Aviation
Lines: 24
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-209.246.94.17.newyork2.level3.net
Message-ID: <385767A2.18A4FAAD@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com



Alexey Zakhlestine wrote:
> 
> Well.... astually AFAIK "free" and "malloc" are C-routines.... not C++
> 
> In C++ you should use new/delete

It may be preferable in most cases to use new and delete in C++, that
first line has an extremely foul taste.  The C++ standard includes free
and malloc as functions with full citizenship, prototyped in the C++
header <cstdlib>, which header does not exist in C (where <stdlib.h>
does exist).

-- 
Martin Ambuhl	mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net

What one knows is, in youth, of little moment; they know enough who
know how to learn. - Henry Adams

A thick skin is a gift from God. - Konrad Adenauer
__________________________________________________________
Fight spam now!
Get your free anti-spam service: http://www.brightmail.com