From: "T.E.Dickey" Subject: Re: vim key commands - not too kool Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: Organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc., Ellicott City, MD USA User-Agent: tin/1.4-19991113 ("No Labels") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.6 (sun4u)) Lines: 17 Message-ID: <7Ka34.46178$oa2.374609@iad-read.news.verio.net> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 16:38:27 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 168.143.0.8 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT verio DOT net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 944584707 168.143.0.8 (Tue, 07 Dec 1999 16:38:27 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 16:38:27 GMT To: djgpp AT Delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In those days, most terminals did NOT send ^H when you pressed > Backspace, so the default binding actually made sense for most of the > dumb terminals. In fact, most Unix terminals didn't have a true > Backspace key for a long time, Backspace was essentially invented by > the PCs. Unix terminals had DEL that sent the 7Fh code. not exactly - it wasn't common practice to use the backspace code because early terminal drivers did not echo it as backspace/space/backspace. The terminals themselves certainly did backspacing - but this was used mainly for visual effects. -- Thomas E. Dickey dickey AT clark DOT net http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey