From: "Daniel H. Luecking" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: vim key commands - not too kool Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:08:08 -0600 Organization: The University of Arkansas Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <199912060054 DOT TAA04169 AT delorie DOT com> <384B22BF DOT 37134096 AT a DOT crl DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: comp.uark.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <384B22BF.37134096@a.crl.com> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Weiqi Gao wrote: > This is f!@#$ stupid, This is f!@#$ stupod, This is f!@#$ stupid, This > is f!@#$ stupid, > > And found out that you misspelled the second 'stupid' as 'stupod'. Now > the cursor is at the end of the line. How many key strokes does it take > to correct the typo? In my editor, the minimum seems to be 3: f Meaning: 1. Run spellcheck 2. Select menu option entire file, "stupod" is found. 3. Accept first suggested replacement. How many more keystrokes to replace all the commas with periods, and adjust the spaces so they are all the same size? :-) This is a DOS editor, by Semware. Counting keystrokes is a stupod way of comparing editors. Intuitiveness is also a bad way to compare editors. However: mapping "^H" to help really was a bad choice. Yes, it only affected dumb terminals (where pressing sent "^H"), but it was a choice made in the days when for many of us dumb terminals connected to mainframe Unixes were our only choices. Which is not to say emacs is a bad editor, but they sure made it hard to learn it in the days when I still had the time to do that. -- Dan Luecking Dept. of Mathematical Sciences luecking AT comp DOT uark DOT edu University of Arkansas http://comp.uark.edu/~luecking/ Fayetteville, AR 72101