From: Real Name <stgeorge AT i-link-2 DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Re: Multitasker for DOS
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 17:21:04 -0800
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <pU1EOEAdrz0qqfnTiH7o6LWr+SPx@4ax.com>
References: <81v5nc$d7f$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <3843AAA4 DOT 7A042288 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> <820p8n$hbn$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com>
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse AT supernews DOT com
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.6/32.525
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

     People in this newsgroup, would
prefer that you use your time, to
introduce new drivers, and graphical
support internally to DesqView;   for
modern hardware, for DesqView,
apparently emphasizing graphics 
boards .

     Remember too, that the likliest
permanent niche for DesqView, is
the smallest, oldest machines, and 
size is crucial .

Ken .


On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:08:11 GMT,
Stargazer <black_phantom AT my-deja DOT com>
wrote:

>  Gautier DOT deMontmollin AT maths DOT unine DOT ch
wrote:
>> What new functionalities compared to,
say, DR-DOS
>> multitasking kernel, that took years
to be debugged ?...
>
>   I don't think there's something
principally new to be done about
>DOS, at least as I see it. My system
currently runs on top of DOS and
>is not bound to any specific vendor or
version. It takes like 200 K of
>memory and doesn't impose further
system requirements.
>
>   The most significant difference
probably is that I'm still flexible.
>I'm not sure by now that I want to
develop a whole DOS package. I can
>customize a multitasking solution to a
legacy DOS-based system or
>custom DOS-based embedded system rather
than pull you to use something
>given and unchangeable.
>
>
>-- http://bphantom.tripod.com --
>
>-- God knows as your dog knows
>Bog blast all of you ---
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.