From: spam AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1 (Bernard Murray, PhD) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: MS Dos 1 Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:41:12 -0700 Organization: UCSF Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <199911300051 DOT TAA04944 AT delorie DOT com> <3843ADC5 DOT 7A44FD21 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> <38451FFF DOT BF35BD99 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: macmac-2.ucsf.edu To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article <38451FFF DOT BF35BD99 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch>, gautier DOT demontmollin AT maths DOT unine DOT ch wrote: I previously wrote: > > What do you mean "much more stable"? > Precisely: than Novell DOS 7 (even with update 15). I shall check this out. Thank you. > The NWCDEX seems to have improved. The last Caldera update was identical with the Novell version so hopefully the new guys have fixed it. > NWCache is inefficient on current HDs, Yes (7 Mb cache lmit). Does it cache CDROMs now? > EMM386' XMS module sees only 64MB, but you can load HIMEM.SYS > from MS-DOS 7.x before loading EMM386. Aha! Thanks again (although I'd prefer a Microsoft-free environment). Bernard PS: (and more on topic) The original IBM PC I used in the lab in 1985 (and now in my mother's attic) came with PC DOS 2.1. -- Bernard P. Murray, PhD bpmurray at cgl . ucsf . edu Department of Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology, UCSF